Thursday, October 22, 2015

The Real Togetherness

The real joy of togetherness is subjective, yet many will reach consensus that the love for nature brings always us together. Yet, I would like to present my thought on the same and try to create an aura of understanding that I have developed over a period of time, seeing the a very different generation in my childhood days and now.

To answer the really subjective question of real joy of being together, I would like to refer to one of the video shared by Kissan, embedded below:



The video give a very deep lesson for the society and suggest a way to socialise. The virtual world has given us a big escape from the real time opportunities. People feel much better in the virtual world. They stay what they want to be without being judged. People are forming community but the campaign raised remain virtual. Nobody works real time to bring the real change - the real togetherness!

In the last post, I wrote about StayZilla, where the innovation was created to socialise the virtual people. Kissan has given a innovative tool to the society to connect together. It is said, people work only if there is some platform and reason for doing so.

Nature is a part and parcel of one's life. The real joy of togetherness for me is the quality time spend in person with the people who have impact on your life. Since, I'm a 90's kid, I do had a real life and hence the real joy in my terms. I remember working on doing horticulture. At least, I had a house with empty land around to grow my hobby plants.

I guess, now the dilemma of virtual vs real has now being being answered. People have now started recognising the importance of connecting in the real time. One whoever have watched the above video, will always appreciate the value of getting connected. Moreover, the importance of nature is a link of doing so. It is the nature earth, that we all share. Nature doesn't discriminate amongst us.

Moreover, people will not understand the importance of something, unless and until they have it. Since people are satisfied under the blanket of virtual world, they don't know the real joy of togetherness. People have created artificial nature, but still there is nothing anything close to as refreshing as the breeze of real mother nature.

At last, not least, I would like to motivate people to be together, at least for the mother nature and I guarantee the real joy. People can only survive being in a society and it is the society that provides us with various ways to enjoy life.

For more fun, visit: http://www.kissanpur.com/

Saturday, October 17, 2015

Stayzilla - A new way to socialize

Internet is said to create a new world for human beings. This so called virtual world is so addictive that it has give a whole new face to escape from day to day life. People are missing out various opportunity to exchange experience on face-to-face basis.

Stayzilla has tried to use the virtual world to connect people. There has been a lot of advertisement which ask people to disconnect to connect. The addiction of virtual world has made people to miss out a lot of opportunity that pass by, in front of eyes. The irony of Stayzilla is that it has used the virtual platform to create some real life connection. This kind of connection has enormous impact as its scalable and people are able to reach people who don't have any connection in between like that of used in lead generation in case of LinkedIn.

The Stayzilla app is a feather touch steering of a Mercedes and move with your hand in line with you and hacks into the mind of traveller. You needn't login to search your abode for stay. Stayzilla, based on the the input given about oneself, finds out the perfect matching profile of stay through it's roboust underwriting. There is also an option to make new buddies who matches your interests. This can further lead to the traveller and his buddy to share a room at stayzilla hotel and splitting the amount, making the stay more affordable too. At last, not least, one can take souvenir for his/her staybuddy.

The front look of the app is so simple and apt that it tempts you to surf through. The text distribution and tabs are available for all possible requirement, which doesn't make you go to desktop website for certain functionality.

So, used the Stayzilla app and #StayConnected #StayZilla

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Being #together

I live in Delhi-Sonepat Highway, the so called NH1. Believe me, it’s more boring that what it sounds. One find day, at my flat, there was a Notice put up by the Residence Welfare Association about a 6 hours power cut. Being first time to National Capital Region, makes me often wonder, what to do and what not, as you don’t know the city. Suddenly, my cell rang up. It was my childhood friend. Thank God, you truly are omnipresent! I rushed to take bath and started with no delay to Connaught Place. We finally met at Palaki Bazaar. It’s quite rejoicing when you suddenly meet your childhood friend at once; especially when there is 6 hours power cut at your flat. My friend is very practical guy. Our meet, mostly end up a monologue from his side towards life and inspirations, but believe me, I love it and I live it to the fullest.

Finally, he asked me if I would like to drink tea. I’m not much of tea guy previously, but Delhi has made me one tea fanatic. He took me to the Chawri Bazaar to a shop, which was too remote. I was very surprise by his choice initially, but when I drank the tea, I knew, what it actually was! I have never ever in my life, ever drank such tea. I have gone places and drank the so called “special tea,” but it was literally a special one. It is rightly said, sometimes, you don’t need any advice, a tea suffice to all. It stimulates everything inside you. If it is good, its mind blowing and removes each and every thought process, and further, above all, when it is with your best friend, it’s just and Buddha Enlightenment, the so called “Nirvana.”

We ended up drinking more than two cups of tea. When the tea is good, you can’t remember the number of cups, and especially when, your friend pays for it! We continued talking and this time, the whole argument went about politics. It’s quiet strange, we always start taking about our own life and then end up discussing other’s life – a phenomenon, so obvious, but never comprehendible.
Although, I have spent many a times with my many friends, but this turns out to be the best amongst those. Precisely because, it gave me lot of optimism that was required by me for the moment, especially when you stay alone for the first time. A small chit chat over tea sometime, matters more than spending whole day, doing fun things, with hell lot of good friends. I call it, ‘The Tea Tweak of Optimism.’ A lot of things can happen over tea also!



If you are new to a place and searching for house, visit: https://housing.com/

Sunday, March 15, 2015

Studying language reveals the structure of mind!

Language is the strongest tool to put forth your thoughts and I feel it does reveal a lot about the speaker. In intra-language communication, when one has exact words to express our thought, the body language radically changes & so does the confidence level. It is seen people with a command on a language, on vocabulary and delivery, are not only able to speak better but also comprehend better because they have a language to assist their thoughts.

Language does shape the way we see the world, the way we think. So not only it helps in expressing our thoughts, it many a times constraints them too. This is where we need to observe people who are bilingual/ multilingual. When speaking of inter-language interaction, people who speak more than one language can generally articulate better. This might be because they have more words and tones for expression. For example, my Nepali friend uses different words for exclaiming in different situation like “achu” on touching something too hot, “attu” when she’s too cold. In Hindi belt, generally the expression is “ahh” for exclaiming. Using such words also form the part of the language you speak. One might conclude, Nepalese is more expressive than Hindi, and so might be the people. Japanese speaker would be more sound oriented, English speaker more tone oriented.

If we compare the use of language to say a working of a computer, language requires real time mapping between words and meanings. It’s like you hear a sentence, nerves take it to the brain, then looks for meaning of the word, then the formulation of sentence, tries to draw inference from its stored knowledge and then accordingly creates a picture in the mind. The process is too quick and shows the structure of the mind. People who know more than one language have thus a larger data to retrieve information and to picture it.

Language does tell us a lot about the mechanism of mind and seen that our ability to think both emotionally and logically is very much dependent on the kind of language we use.

There is no specific domain for the expression of language. Two person can speak the very same expression with a much distinct representation. The way one expresses the thought, often reveals the way, s/he is thinking. Even the same sentence spoken by a person can actually differ in the way it is expressed. However, at times, we often find some people to be over-expressive and certain people to be monotonous. This can be justified by taking his or her attitude towards the subject under conversation. This leads us to visualize language as the complex mixture of thinking and emotions. Thus considering all the three major functions viz. cognition, feeling and volition. This provides the tick to checkpoint for a way to understand, how a mind is structured.


If one inquiries into the reading habits of a person, one finds, a certain type of people, reads the sentence and then hear it and thereby recognize the meaning. Another set of faster reader, reads the sentence in mind and then captures the meaning of the sentence. But, there also exist a much faster reader, who out of vision of looking at the sentence phrases, recognizes its meaning. This trend shows that our mind is trained to look at a particular sound or symbol and relate it to particular image in the mind. A person who is impaired to do such a matching suffers from dyslexia. It’s more like developing an understanding of dependent variable based on the knowledge of independent variable. Now, suppose a person has matched a particular set of symbols to an image in mind and now that he articulates what s/he is thinking, s/he is basically converting is image of thought in mind to this set of predefined symbols. Thus, in a way we are able to capture the structure of flow of thought in mind. However, a strong critique of it could be that, due to language, a particular person is trained to think in those directions. Given the free will of mind, one may choose to think differently, but due to conformity problems, one has to give up his/her own way of thinking. This is quite observed when an amateur SVO person, trained in SOV, is asked to converse in SVO. S/he often end up distorting the SVO into SOV. This is because, s/he is not initially coming up with his/her own mother tongue and then translating it to the foreign language; rather s/he is directly converting his thinking into the words of foreign language and that s/he is trained to think in SOV lines. Still, we can bit by bit generalize some universal grammar; which is quite an insightful in providing a major way in which one’s mind is structured, leaving aside the free will freedom.

Saturday, March 14, 2015

“The Analytical Engine has no pretensions to originate anything. It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform” - An objection by Lady Lovelace

Lady Lovelace in her memoirs (1942) states that how so ever a learning machine evolves with technological advancement; its execution would always be restricted to its programming (set of instructions), fed to it by humans. A machine can never produce original thoughts & ideas. Turning defying the argument said that the kind of machines Lady Lovelace saw lacked such properties. She couldn't witness sufficient evidence to prove that when speed and storage capacity of the machine will increase, machine might “surprise” you. Further he adds that even humans are trained specie. The thoughts they generate are either results of the genetic information they inherit at birth or due to their nurturing by various social institutions. I beg to differ with Turing’s arguments.

Turing hoped that in the new millennium, with increased speed and storage capacity a machine might be able to imitate human mind. But as we can see, Machines till now are only capable of deduction and induction mechanism. They cannot produce original ideas. E.g. Let us take the invention of Submarine. A human mind observed the motion of a fish in water, how its stream lined body facilitated its movement. It thus made a mental representation and imagined a watercraft designed on similar lines to travel water bodies. I doubt that a machine fed with similar information could generate the idea of a submarine. Moreover, can a machine think of using paper towels to wipe liquids by observing the capillary action in a tree? Can a machine perform ‘jugaad’, innovation? Answer till now is a NO.


Humans, undoubtedly are nurtured under various institutions, be it family, school etc. But there they are educated and not trained. They are imparted knowledge, yet have the power to execute their choice. It is not the case with machines. Their outputs are restricted to the set of instructions given to them by humans. Many AI theorists propose that if machine’s table is included with some kind of probabilistic calculations, it might produce original, unexpected results. Arguably the results would be unexpected and ‘by chance’, not by ideas and innovation which only human mind is capable of. Machines are thus not empowered but bound by programming which leaves them inefficient to generate new ideas.

Monday, March 9, 2015

Turing Test

The essence of the Turing Test revolves around whether a computer can successfully impersonate or imitate a human given the subjects communicate solely via messaging system. To pass the test, a computer would have to be capable of communicating, at least as competently as a person. As there is no restriction on the subject matter, anything within the scope of an average human being can be asked by the interrogator. This comes out to be having possibilities of discussion in different fields like art, science, personal history, social relationships etc.

I believe the scope of the communication between the interrogator and the machine being so vast and diverse, it is highly unlikely to imprint all the various possibilities into any system, with which it can behave in same way as a men do. Moreover the machines do not understand what they are doing. They just process imprinted information present within them. They also lack instinct behaviour and common sense which can be observed differently in different human beings.

I believe that no machine can replace /imitate a human perfectly. The ‘free will’ that men have is absent in machines. Decades of artificial intelligence have made machines better but could not provide ‘free will’ to them. This would mean that while two identical men in the same situation might respond differently, two similar machines under same situation would respond the same way. Along with the time, we tend to evolve which makes us highly unpredictable. Even the most advanced AI (Artificial intelligence) systems or machines just uses some specific or predefined symbols for pattern matching there by producing an output .They actually don’t understand the meaning of the symbols. To a machine, all the symbols are similar. If the meaning of a specific symbol is changed then they would never be able to give a correct output. I believe that machines can be used to facilitate human interaction than to replace them.

Are there ways that AI can have thinking power, going forward?

Turing felt that within 50 years of his paper, that is by 2000, computers would’ve been designed which could pass his ‘test’. Why do you think it did not happen? Turing believed in constantly evolving embedded intelligence in a machine. But if we see the present trend, it’s more of a complexity question. People are into developing a faster computing device, given that time has gain paramount importance, equivalent to money! Turing nine arguments to object the question of intelligence in machine, attacks the prevalent notion and itself justifies that speed and ample memory is just the prerequisites, but not the end.

The foundation of AI lies with the neural networks, fuzzy logics and genetic algorithm. These networks are trained with specific domain values in order to produce the results. This delimits space under test to a restricted function. After a machine is trained with the set of rules and functions, it only thinks on these lines and predicts the probability of a set of possible outcomes. Moreover, the idea of making a choice is so deterministic and guided that it lacks self-evolution. Now suppose, we have a system which is self-evolving, it will be able to generate its own intelligence. For example, a simple AI machine, by touching a hot water will make sure, it will not be touching it any further; but if this machine has self-evolutionary power, it will be able to generate its own gloves that will protect it in future.

As per Charles Darwin, living being embodies the survival for the fittest. It is this nature that makes living being evolve over time and handle the problem likewise. Now suppose, a machine is developed on these lines, it will surely evolve its own assets and understanding of its environment, just like what humans do, and so will be able to write a sonnet. This in-turn implies that they will possess a certain feeling of its own as experienced by the surroundings. Human emotions are guided by the hormonal levels. There exist certain biomedical chips, which are based on the similar principles. It processes the data based on level of chemical (an analogue signal). This can be viewed as a certain kind of feeling that the machine had towards the input – a case similar to desire. If we see human body, we in-fact are surviving due to the digesting action of E. coli bacteria present in our intestine, on our food. This show that humans alone in itself, can’t work the way they are working, in isolation. What I feel is that, we mislead in the direction towards the development of a machine that can pass the Turing test, as we are grossly ignoring the two major aspects of intelligence, i.e. evolution and mutual-existence. If we try to incorporate these two into the AI development, we will be able to embody the free-will into the machine.

Why are we ignoring animal communication?

One of the reasons to study cognitive science is to understand how information is represented, processed and transformed within nervous system of humans and animals. Such understanding necessarily requires comparison  of communication within and outside different species. This might help us support the idea that human communication is actually different if not over and above other species' communication process.

If we look at how humans communicate, both verbally and nonverbally, it is only a set of people who understand a single language (both sign & verbal). For example, a European with English as his only known language would find it difficult to express his idea to say only Hindi Indian. Even the signs he'll use to describe his thoughts would be way different from the understanding of the Indian. Here both the language and the place people belong to play a significant role. Even on the level of perception, here, even if the reader and I know the same language and even are from same place, what he infers from this write-up might be completely different from what I am trying to put across.

Now if we see animal communication, and for that matter even human- animal interaction, we see a smoother understanding being generated between the two. I'm no expert in animal  communication, but what I have seen and observed is that theirs is a Universal language. A cow from Delhi might not find it difficult to communicate with another cow in Tamil Nadu whereas for  a Delhite it would be really difficult to communicate in the state of Tamil Nadu.

Not only place or language but the sense perception, previous knowledge through education, reason, imagination, faith, emotion etc play equally important role in communication. This extra baggage is not carried by animals per se. Thus the purpose of attending this question as a part of this inquiry would help in deeper understanding of human mind.

Friday, March 6, 2015

Programmatic question under inquiry: Why are we ignoring animal communication?

The inquiry about the animal communication should not be left out of the present inquiry space. Speech is one of the most perceived and identified stimulus free activity seen amongst the animate objects! It represents the free will and plays the most important role in determining the instant as well as future behavior. Many animal such as parrot seemed to have the faculty of sounds needed as present in human as they are able to reproduce it, but still they are not developing the skill! Don’t they want to develop this skill or they have their own ways to communicate? A bat emits sounds in inaudible range and so we don’t know if they are actually saying some word or not.

If we talk about our other senses like our sight, only a part of light frequency spectrum is visible to us, whereas if we talk about the bees, their visible range for frequency is far more. Scientist even conclude this by saying that probably bees are able to conceive more colors that humans do! Or probably as I think, the light spectrum the human see is spread across their visible frequency spectrum. If so, the object we see as orange might be still red for them. So, we don’t actually know, if the animal are communicating or not. It’s definite that they don’t use human kind of faculty for the same but they might be communicating via their own hidden ways!

Humans are constrained by their perception five senses. Even these senses are not complete in itself. It’s very well possible that we don’t have any ability to perceive them at all, but with the progress in technology, people have gone beyond their sense capabilities. Keeping the argument under the inquiry will enable the research in the field of communication. We are often bound by the linguistic constraints as many a time one witness in our day to day life! Probably, keeping an eye open to this inquiry will enable humans to be able to communicate more and with a higher frequency.

Further, communication doesn't mean only the verbal part of it. It can also relay via some other senses, like we all do when we fight or get angry. Certain signs can represent a scenario so effectively, that it can’t happen verbally. All these lumps together to form a free will part of the world’s society. Study of the animal communication, once incorporated to human lives, can enhance the degree of freedom for the free will. This will, in turn, help in understanding the philosophy of science underneath communication.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

A Big Night (Movie review)

Big Night movie is a story of two brothers Primo and Secondo from Italy, who has emigrated from Italy and had open a restaurant Paradise in America. But, there were not able to flourish their business and the banks required repayment of the loan by the end of the month as there have been lots of delays already.

Primo was a conservative man. He didn’t want to alter the food as per the people there wanted. For him food of Italy was more sacred. There was an Italian restaurant opposite to them that was getting more and more popular day by day. It was because of the fact that they were serving what the people wanted. On the other hand, Primo was not at all okay to serve two starch together when the customer wasn’t able to find any seafood in the perfect seafood dish risotto and orders spaghetti and meatball as the side dish.

With a view of taking some valuable feedback from his competitor, the neighboring Italian restaurant, about the business, Secondo approaches the owner Pascal. Pascal gives a very motivating speech to him and tells him that he will arrange for Louis Prima, the great Italian-American singer for a dinner at their restaurant as he was one of good friend of his.  This would lead to the publicity by the media in all the newspapers, business will pick up and that the restaurant can be saved.

Secondo starts making the arrangement for the big night with all the money he has. He arranges for the flower, bakery, etc. Primo also starts cooking at his best. He makes dishes like lasagna and many more to name Italian dish at its best. There was a moment when the brother Primo gets to know that the famous singer Louis was arranged by the owner of his competitor restaurant, Pascal. The big feast begins when hours later; it becomes apparent that Louis is not coming and Primo sends one magnificent course after the other from his kitchen. As the audience eats the food, they all become emotional by the taste of the same. They even comment that Louis doesn’t know what he is missing. Still, Secondo keeps the food for just in case Louis turns up! For Primo too, the food was a way to talk to the divine as he tells the flower woman, to whom he was secretly in love and was shy about to say the same.

Gabriella, the mistress of Pascal had a secret affair with Secondo. When Secondo’s girlfriend Phyllis catches both of them, she went to the seashore and Secondo follows her to find her. Meanwhile, being very much influenced by food and hard work of Primo, Gabriella tells him that Pascal never called Louis. Primo goes to find Secondo at the beach which is accompanied by a small fight between the two. Primo puts his suggestion to return back to Rome as his uncle has arrangements for both of them there, but Primo rejects the proposal.

The following morning, Secondo makes omelet and distributes the same between himself, his worker and his brother Primo and movie ends with both of them hugging each other while eating.

Talking about the character of Secondo, he was a very flexible personality. He was open to almost anything to make his business work. But at the same time, he didn’t want to hurt the feelings of his brother Primo. He was so open that he approached his competitor Italian restaurant next to them for suggestions. This made him vulnerable to the manipulation by the businessman. He got inspired by his speech so much that he didn’t do any background check on the same. The loan and the down going business had such a pressure on Secondo’s mind that he didn’t want to commit to his girlfriend Phyllis.

Primo was a very conservative person. He didn’t want to change the cuisine as per the people demand. He rather wanted to make them understand about the significance and relevance of the existing cuisine. Even when, Primo discovers that his brother Secondo went upto Pascal for help, despite of his sadness, he doesn’t ruin his brother’s motive. Primo was very much passionate about cooking. That’s he hated the neighbor restaurant, which provided the food that people want in the name of Italian food. He referred the same as the rape of the cuisine. Again, he puts forward his plan to go back to Rome in Italy in front of his brother Secondo with a belief to include him too. He postpones disclosing the same after the big feast.

But Secondo was very much positive not to leave America, as he tells while they fought at the beach. Instead, Secondo argues with Primo that he doesn’t know how hardly he has been managing the business at macro-level so far.

Pascal, with a mind of businessman, wanted to make the two brothers broke, so that they either join him in his restaurant or return to Italy. He clarifies at the end that he didn’t do so because of the secret affair with his mistress but for the interest of the business. But the godly food of Primo, made him admit his mistake, when his mistress Gabriella discloses his real motive, seeing the hard work of Primo.

The two brother affection towards each other at the end showed that nothing matters to them the most then each other. Primo was staying back in America just because his brother Secondo wanted to and Secondo was not telling Primo to change the way he cooks food. They both have understanding and support for each other.

Caste aside: Ambedkar vs Gandhi

Among the various concerns raised by Ambedkar in his speech, the most prominent one is that social reform is necessary for political reform. He has raised many issues which might appear equally important like social reform being a precursor for economic reform or caste system as division of labour and not labourers or debunking the idea of racial purity as the objective of caste system. But on no other topic, he invests so much time as on the issue of political reform. He has dedicated considerable part of his speech explaining the nuances of political reform in India. He goes back in history to explain how congress and social conference started under the same roof and how they gradually drifted away so much so that turned hostile.

The fact that this speech was to be delivered in a politically charged environment, where the country was at the cusp of political change, puts the issue of politics at the top slot. Ambedkar has done intensive research and cited many examples to bring out the social inequality that was prevalent in the country. He cites example of Peshwas in the Maratha country,where the untouchable was not allowed to use the public streets if a Hindu was coming along. He provides several other examples to drive home the point that ‘lower’ caste was not being allowed to get education, food etc of its choice.

The reason why Ambedkar decides to raise this concern in the beginning is that it sets the context for other arguments that follow. It provides the genesis of political reform and social reform and how political reform got precedence for social reform. It also explains how the social reform itself was steered by upper caste and hence had myopic vision of the problems faced by the families of upper caste.

All other issues raised subsequently emanate from the issue of political reform. Moreover, this idea of social reform echoes in the entire speech. Whether Amebdkar is talking about economic reform or of racial purity or of national integration, in one way or the other he refers to the political reform. While talking of economic reform, he concludes by saying –

“You cannot have political reform, you cannot have economic reform, unless you kill this monster.”

Ambedkar has backed his claims by referring to the speech delivered by Mr. W. C. Bonnerji in 1892 at Allahabad, as President of the eighth session of the Congress, where Bonnerji says –

"I for one have no patience with those who say we shall not be fit for political reform until we reform our social system. I fail to see any connection between the two. . .Are we not fit (for political reform) because our widows remain unmarried and our girls are given in marriage earlier than in other countries? Because our wives and daughters do not drive about with us visiting our friends? Because we do not send our daughters to Oxford and Cambridge?"

This excerpt, as per Ambedkar, proves the apathy of congress towards social reform. He then turns to history of Ireland where Ulster debunked Irish Home Rule. He also cites many religious reforms like reform by Buddha,saints of Maharashtra and Guru Nanak which preceded the political reform. Hence Ambedkar puts the religious reforms in the ambit of social reform. Hence making a compelling case in favor of social reform.

Freedom Struggle: From Within and Without

Ambedkar’s speech “Annihilation of Caste” was prepared as the presidential address for the annual conference of a Hindu reformist group, Jat-Pat Todak Mandal on the ill effects of caste in Hindu society. Reading through his speech, I got new insights into the caste dynamics and its impact on the freedom struggle. At the cusp of independence, Country was politically charged. My idea was that we collectively fought the foreign forces and threw them away. While we might have stood united, we had internal divisions as well. We were fighting battles within ourselves. This also helped me understand how England ruled over us for years, even though we outnumbered them. While historians often claim that British divided us and ruled courtesy their ‘divide and rule’ policy, we were already divided on the lines of caste, which must have served as a fertile ground for England to rule.

Ambedkar cites examples of how untouchables were not allowed to get into the mainstream. They were not allowed to have food of their choice or move around freely. They had limited access to public places like wells and temples. While untouchability as a concept is not new to me, the extent and nature of it is beyond human purview. I have seen my acquaintances in village maintaining a safe distance from certain set of people. These are the same people who are not allowed to enter the temples. But I have always been on the other side and could never feel the pains and pangs of untouchables. The idea that an untouchable should not walk on the streets when an upper caste Hindu happens to be on the street testifies the injustice and inequality in the society. “It is foolish to take solace in the fact that because the Congress is fighting for the freedom of India, it is, therefore, fighting for the freedom of the people of India and of the lowest of the low.” [1]

Ambedkar, in the above lines, makes a distinction between the freedom of India and freedom of people of India. For the people of lower caste, freedom would have simply meant a change in the face. They were oppressed by the British under colonial rule and would have been oppressed by their own people under ‘swaraj’. Ambedkar displays commendable foresightedness to suggest during freedom struggle that social revolution was as important as political and economic revolution, if not more. It also hints towards a flaw in the approach mainstream leaders followed for freedom struggle. They should have first tried to stand united. Had we been united, we would have been free long back.

Does this imply that Hindu leaders were unaware of the importance of social revolution or of it being a precursor for political revolution? Ofcourse not. “It is necessary to make a distinction between social reform in the sense of the reform of the Hindu family, and social reform in the sense of the reorganization and reconstruction of the Hindu Society. The former has a relation to widow remarriage, child marriage, etc., while the latter relates to the abolition of the Caste System.”[2]

Ambedkar makes a clear distinction between the reform of Hindu family and Hindu society. He suggests that reformers who belong to upper caste ignore the demon called untouchability. Their area of concern is limited to the problems faced by upper caste Hindus, while the cries of lower caste Hindus go unheard.  Arundhati Roy also endorses this view and labels Gandhi, Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Swami Vivekananda as ‘privileged-caste Hindu reformers’. [3]

Having said that, Ambedkar’s suggestion that Hindus are divided and all other religions of the world stand united is unacceptable. Even today we see all the religion be it Hinduism, Islam, Christianity or Sikhism have their own differences. Ambedkar’s argument that lower caste are preferring to shift to other religion is valid. But he exaggerates it by saying,

“Among Sikhs and Muslims there is a social cement which makes them Bhais. Among Hindus there is no such cement.”[4]

My intention here is not to justify division within Hindus by pointing finger towards other religion, but to drive home a fact that all the religion end up dividing people and hence fails the entire purpose of religion. A true religion is one which unites people. I also believe that British helped us shed our caste differences and come together for common good. For example, Ambedkar shunned his inimical relations with Congress and joined hands to draft the constitution. Also, as the people from lower caste got representation, their concerns could no longer be ignored. They made their presence felt and safeguards were put in place to provide a level playing field for them. One of the safeguards being reservation of seats for untouchables, who were put in the bracket of Schedules caste.

Hence the freedom movement not only marked the change of power centers, but also witnessed a reversal of trend. With the untouchables, initially being oppressed, they now enjoyed special privileges. While before independence, various castes tried to move up to the upper caste, today they want to be included in the backward castes to get the privileges of reservation. A recent demand by Gujjars stands in testimony to it. Hence Ambedkar’s text helps understand the caste dynamics.

Gandhi’s response “Vindication of Caste” published in ‘Harijan’ helps understand the genesis of caste system. He provides the ideal view of how caste system should be. The chaturvarna system and each varna complementing each other brings out the picture of harmonious and united society. It also establishes the crucial difference between varna and caste and establishes the fact that Hinduism as religion does not endorse division of laborers and keeps all the occupation on the same pedestal. So putting views of both Ambedkar and Gandhi together, one realizes that untouchability and rigid caste boundaries are the adulterations that crept into the religion gradually.

The overall tone of Ambedkar in his speech was defensive, while that of Gandhi was complacent and paternal. Was it the inherent trait of the caste they represented? We don’t have enough evidence from the text to support this, but it can’t be denied altogether. When Arundhati Roy says, “Ambedkar was a prolific writer. Unfortunately his work, unlike the writings of Gandhi, Nehru or Vivekananda, does not shine out at you from the shelves of libraries and bookshops.”[5] And further adds, “History has been unkind to Ambedkar. First it contained him, and then it glorified him.”[6] She clearly highlights the injustice done to Ambedkar. But whether this was due to his caste would always be hard to ascertain.

Ambedkar’s work brings to life the caste system prevalent in the pre-independence era. While many of us today abhor reservation, it justifies why certain set of people needed safeguards and privileges. Ambedkar and Roy expose ‘the gap between what most Indians are schooled to believe in and the reality we experience every day of our lives.’[5] And in the process, I realized how history might have been tailored to favor certain individuals. Connecting the dots looking backwards one can say that Caste was a bigger demon and threat to nation than the foreign forces. Hence Ambedkar’s concern were not misplaced. On the contrary, all those who jumped the guns and advocated that political revolution should get precedence over social revolution, did a great disservice to the nation.

Caste boundaries might have blurred over time, but it has failed to vanish. Today, no one is barred to fetch water from the well, mostly because there are no wells and even if certain villages have wells, the water has long dried.  Inter-caste marriages are still looked down upon. Riots still occur. Politicians still appeal to caste sentiments and manipulate the voters on the lines of caste. Such incidents would have found place neither in India of Gandhi nor of Ambedkar. It’s time we introspect, what good has the caste division done in the last so many years. If we have reasons good enough to hold on to it, we must. Else, let’s work towards a new religion, a new caste- that of nationalism.


Citations:

1. Section 11, The Doctor and the Saint by Arundhati Roy

2. Para 1, Page 5, Annihiliation of Caste   by Dr B. R Ambedkar

3. Section 3, The Doctor and the Saint by Arundhati Roy

4. Para 4, Page 14, Annihiliation of Caste   by Dr B. R Ambedkar

5. Section 1, The Doctor and the Saint by Arundhati Roy

6. Section 13, The Doctor and the Saint by Arundhati Roy

Smallpox disease in formal and popular thought in Indian society

Smallpox has a long history in India. Science and philosophy were both highly developed discipline in ancient India. It is therefore highly expected to have an Indian Medical response to the disease. To its rescue, Hindu scriptures do mentions the disease along with its inoculation treatment and even has a goddess devoted exclusively to the cause. The paper will focus on differentiating the popular as well as formal culture amongst the Indians and try to find out the linkages between the two. Intelligentsias of today’s world are often skeptical about the personification of the disease and its worship to have something to do with relating it to the supernatural power driving the universe as the ancient people did to natural activities such as rain, thunder when they had no reasoning to answer it. But it’s possible that these practices were the code of conduct issued by the academic class to handle the giant epidemic and communicate the measures effectively to the general public in a way they are more familiar and bound to. The article will also try to find if any rationale practices of treating smallpox have changed overtime into superstitious belief in contemporary India. It will try to dwell the fact of coexistence of medical treatment as well as religious practices.

Religion holds a place of paramount importance when it comes to viewing pattern of life of the people in different parts of India. Smallpox is usually identified with the goddess Sitala (literally, ‘the cool one’), or mata (mother) in northern India. A similar framework is seen in the worship of Tamil deity Mariamman (and also amma). Anjum Katyal [13], an editor in Bengal argues the Sitala worship to be pre-Aryan, done by the tribes of Bengal, Assam, Bihar and Orissa. It was latter on Brahminised or gentrified. Rulers and religious leaders of early India often used to take the help of local tradition to spread the religious message. One such context can be seen in Sitala Sastri Yatra that happens in Sambalpur, Orissa. It is a folk drama indicating the cultural elements of tradition. The popularity of this folk drama has attracted people from diverse areas of Orissa and neighbouring state of Chhattisgarh. Having seen the popular culture prevalent even today in Indians, let’s explore the formal societies of ancient India.

Caraka-samhita [1] is an early text on Ayurveda (Indian traditional medicine), which existed even before the Christian era, but were put to writings only in the 4th century AD. Smallpox was described under the name of masurika (roots from a type of pulse masur, which happens to look like the pustules eruptions due to the similarity in color, shape and consistency) in the text. Arab Physician Al Razi [8] refers Caraka as the authority for statement in Plants and drugs and described the way Indians prepared syrups of pearls in a different manner that is known to only them; and claimed that if nine pustules have come out and one drinks this syrup, tenth will not appear. Alongside the same timeline, another text Susruta-samhita [2] provides more elaborate description in his Bhishagratna. Later in seventh century, the physician Vagbhata [4] provides significant description of masurika in his Astangahrdaya-samhita. This was the first attempt in Indian medicine, were Smallpox was shown to be fatal. In eight century, Madhava-kara [5] composed a more extensive chapter in masurika in his book Nidana. Along with describing the numerous types of pustular eruptions, he also provided the humoral and dietary explanation of its various forms.

An anthropologist, Nicholas [11] argued that nature of Madhava treatment was exclusively biological, until late fifteen or early sixteenth century, when parisista (appendix) on ‘The Pathology of Sitala’ was introduced to his text. Unlike the existing text, this part pictured Goddess Sitala as the cause of disease. Following this in the very same century, Bhava Misra compiled a medical text Bhava-prakasa by repeating everything from the Madhava’s text including the parisista and further included both recommendation on medical treatment and worship of the goddess Sitala. Otherwise, there is no such account of worship in the Atharva-veda [3], or any other ancient texts. Thus, the sixteenth century India saw two very different interpretation of smallpox: one based on Ayurveda and other on Sitala worship. One can relate this to the Thucydides account [7], where he mentions that Plague was no longer thought to be regarded as the something given by God as misfortune leading to the end of traditional religious belief, but some survivor of the plague started healing cult of Asclepius, the son of Apollo, who became the embodiment of the conventional religious sensitivities. Skandapurana [6], a text written in 18th and 19th century mentions her to be born out of the mind of Brahma and that he asked Shiva and Vishnu to worship her, granting her the power of visiting sickness. It also mentions about her attendant, specially her son Jwarasur (the fever demon). To add more credibility to the sacredness of the performance of Sitala worship, Nityananda wrote Sitalamangala text. Adding to the same, various performing troupe, like that of New Loknath Opera, led to the wide spread nature of the Sitala worship.

The onset of Smallpox is considered to be the manifestation of the goddess as if it were her khel (play), and so it should be tolerated with respect and honour. It is said that the patient becomes the abode of Sitala. The patient and the goddess are fed basora (cooling food) such as cold rice, plantains, and yoghurt. Cooling drinks are officered to the patient and heating foods are banned, sexual activity is minimized and all other heating activities are abstained from. The patient’s body is rubbed with neem patta (leaf of a cooling neem tree) by a mali (gardener). If the disease progressed, a cooling mixture of turmeric and flour is applied. Finally, when the boils of smallpox ripen, a small thorn is used to prick them and give relief to the patient. When the fever subsided, prayers are offered to the Sitala along with cooling offering of coconut, rice,and flowers. Thus, smallpox was treated as a case of being possessed by Sitala. The best physician could do was to prescribe cooling drafts, use purgatives to relieve the body of its poisons, and to prescribe items that could prolong the pittam (bilious humour, generates the heat which is responsible for metabolism) imbalance in the body. The rest was under the control of Sitala.

The one other practice was that a special vaidya (medical practitioner) or tikadars (innoculator) could use was varolation, which was latter largely taken over by vaccination. Arnold [14] argues how the practice was locally understood as a way of invoking the protective power of Sitala’s right over the patient’s body, instead of violating it. This allowed the practice to be viewed as a celebration of the Goddess compared to violation. Holwell [8], a British EIC physician mentions the prevalence of inoculation technique (Intentionally mildly infecting a person with no pox history in order to achieve immunity) in Bengal during the eighteen century India, even before the introduction of Jenner Vaccine (1798) came in. This was popularly known as tika (derived form of vatika, which means a small globule). There was no such use of inoculation in the western world before the tenth century. It is now used to refer vaccination. It was based on the theory of bija (seed) mixed with the blood of a person, which was not present in the Ayurvedic explanation of the disease. An Indian historian, Dharampal [9] found that the inoculation was to be prevalent in Bengal in the mid eighteenth century. It was pointed out that the inoculators were the low class of both Hindu and Muslim people such as small cultivators, garland maker, barbers, low ranking astrologer Brahmans and not as esteemed as physicians. It was later found that a text called Vasanta-tika (smallpox inoculation) existed amongst the Napit (barbers).

One can’t deny the fact of coexistence of the both the Medical practices of inoculation as well as its view in term of Sitala worship. There is a sharp bonding between the two. The Hindu scriptures also seemed to support the same eventually. Probably, this was the way the elite academic class used to propagate the idea of handling the disease amongst the people. It seemed to be coded version of rational practices. The propagation of the idea in terms of storytelling definitely has a much wider impact to the society and spreads with a faster pace. Some of the contemporary practices might look like superstition but beholding the rationality behind some of the practices shows that it’s not just blind faith but has some essence of science and philosophy embedded in it.


References

[1] Loon, Gabriel Von, “Caraka-samhita” 2 vols, P V Sharma and Chaukhamba Orientalia Publishers, 2002-03

[2] Bhishagratna, Kunja Lal, “An English translation of Susruta-samhita” 3 vols, Calcutta, 1911

[3] Whitney, William Dwight, “Atharva-veda samhita”, Harvard Univ, 1905

[4] Hilgenberg, Luise, and Willibald Kirfel, “Vagbhata’s  Astangahrdaya-samhita”, Leiden: E J Brill, 1941

[5] Madhavakara, “Madhava-nidanam”, Edited by Yadava-sarmana, Bombay: Nirnaya-sagara Press, 1920

[6] “Skanda Mahapuarana”, Bombay: Venkatesvara Sream Press, 1908-09

[7] Thucydides et al, “History of the Peloponnesian War”, 1954

[8] Holwell, J Z, “Accounts of the Manner of Inoculation in East Indies”, London, 1767

[9] Dharampal, “Indian Science And Technology In The Eighteenth Century”, Delhi: Impex India, 1971

[10] Greenhill, William Alexander, “A Treatise on Smallpox and Measles by Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi (Rhazes)”, London: The Sydenham Soceity, 1847

[11] Nicholas, Ralph, “The Goddess Sitala and Epidemic Smallpox in Bengal”, The Journal of Asian Studies, 1981

[12] Holwell, J Z, “An account of the manner of inoculating for the smallpox in the East Indies”, London College, 1767

[13] Katyal, Anjum, “Performing the Goddess: Sacred ritual into Professional Performance”, The MIT Press, 1988

[14] Arnold, D, “Colonizing the body”, UC Press, CA, 1993

Monday, January 26, 2015

Mathematics as a form of art...

I came upon with this thesis as I have been mostly obsessed with mathematics day in and day out. I have worked in various technical fields such as electrical, electronics, computers and mechanical but throughout, I have always been involved in tweaking mathematics. One of the key things that I personally felt was that at the end of the day, whenever I derived something such as a formula result, at the end, I tend to beautify the same by aligning the different part of the equations. Even in the book if one sees, most of the final results are beautified and this also helps in remembrance of the same. This is much common activity in the physics textbooks, where one has to remember a lot of formulas. Further, most of the questions asked in a mathematics paper are so much so beautified to create patterns out of it. Even the solution can be beautiful. One of my mathematics teachers was very much obsessed with questions that are beautifully solved. He used to compile all these solution in a file. A great example here would be puzzle. What exactly puzzle is? – It’s an art on building blocks of mathematics. All these thought process along with my readings on art appreciation class led me to a question – ‘Is Math Art?’ Answer that I finally discovered to this open ended question was – ‘Of course it is!’

What can drew one to think is the idea that ‘Is all a tautology?’ i.e. A implies B, B implies C to C implies A. If it's all logic, there really shouldn't be anything to understand. The early one figures out that it's not logic, the better it is. What keeps one from understanding it and that one couldn't follow the logic is that these ideas are so different and new. One can finally realize that it wasn't all about logic but rather about the creative process. Sometimes it gives a feeling of ‘writing a book’ or ‘providing piece of music’ as one solves a math problem, because it's not about the tools, everyone knows about the tools, it's about how one put them together. There's a little bit artistry involved and that's what drew one to it. One gets drawn into geometry just because it really emphasizes the ‘visual’ aspect as well as the ‘aesthetic’ aspect. One honestly can find a kind of beauty in thinking creatively about problems because somehow something doesn't click until two dollars. There's a little bit of mystery to the creative process. What exactly clicks in your brain that takes you from not being able to solve problem to solving it. One really enjoys their thinking about beautiful problems. Mathematics is known for the use of aesthetic terms in describing their way of work. Nobody can deny the fact that beauty lies in the eyes of beholders. A lot of people, irrespective of whether they are from a mathematical background or not, they seem to appreciate the state of art that mathematics provide. Vi Hart, a self described ‘recreational mathemusician’ from National Museum of Mathematics performed dance with music by representing each figure as a digit. She represented a series of numbers using the powers of 2. She also danced for the value of pi in binary. Finally, she made a painting out of that hand dance by having different color for her different fingers. Scott Kim is an artist and use mathematics as his language. He is the author of many American puzzles and has also designed many computer games. He describes his work as the relationship of mathematics with various shapes and sizes.

Mathematics is as valid a form of art, as any other. Now it's difficult to put into words, exactly what it is that makes numbers and symbols so appealing - but according to scientists, it boils down to simple brain chemistry. In a recent study at University College in London, researchers showed a group of mathematicians 60 different mathematical equations, and asked them to rate those equations on a scale of "ugly” to "beautiful," while inside an fMRI scanner. The results showed that the more "beautiful" an equation was - according to the test subject - the more likely it was to elicit activity in the A1 field of the medial orbitofrontal cortex. This is the part of your brain that's typically associated with emotional responses to visual and musical beauty. Thus, people like us respond to numbers and equations, the same way other people do to music or art. But even people with no musical talent can still appreciate good music - so what constitutes beauty in math? And does the appreciation of it require some understanding of its meaning? Well, not necessarily. To test that idea, researchers performed the same study on a control group - with no special appreciation of math. And while those subjects did show a significantly lower emotional response to the equations - a handful of them were still capable of finding their beauty - even with no understanding of what they actually mean. So what makes an equation "objectively beautiful"? Is it just a formula of curves and shapes, maybe symmetry that makes it pleasing to the eye? It's difficult to quantify the exact reasons, but there is one equation consistently rated to be the most attractive - and that's Euler's identity (1+e=0) – perhaps because it contains the 3 most fundamental numbers in the mathematical universe, e, π, and i. It's a pretty hot equation. What's the ugliest, if one asks, according to the mathematicians in this study, it's the Srinivasa Ramanujan's rapidly converging infinite series of π.

                                            Figure 1                                                                             Figure 2

Data visualization is a way of representing information and an artistic and interesting way. Scientists might be happy with scatter plots in black-on-white laps, but if one wants to communicate information and data to the public, he or she would want it to be enjoyable as well as colorful. To quote one of the chief icons of such form is Martine Kaminsky. It is quite interesting to look at his artistic work, finding beautiful artistry in the randomness of pi. His painting as seen in Figure 1 is pi in a beautiful colorful way. What make it so special is that, it is done in the simplest way one could have think off. He takes the digits of pi and gives each digit a different color to start with three. Three is an orange color there, then one is a red, four is a yellow, one again is red and then five is green, nine is purple and so on. it makes a really beautiful poster, one can kind of see the randomness of it, but one can’t see it as any particular pattern to the colors; which is which reflects the randomness of the digits of pi is well. To take that further, he started to kind of make the center of the circle using the color of the next digit. Probably he did so, just to make it a bit prettier at produced. He might have found it interesting because he had to join up digits that had the same colors in them. In a research like this, they care to go a bit further and in this art, she connects digits adjacent digits in his poster that have same color, so actually they are the same number, which makes the disconnected networks. One doesn’t need to use any great mathematical truth defined underneath this. This is a thought and Martine is very clear about himself that this is less about the mathematics and more about the beauty of it. But it is intriguing as well. The other way one could do this is if he put the digits of pi in a spiral as seen in the Figure 2. This looks similar to tiling in a Roman bath house. Something that makes one happy, maybe that's because of the colors she used. But to take this a step further is one of Brady's Patriots. It makes us think that we should just appreciate the beauty of that before we describe it and not merely bringing the beauty of it by describing it and not doing the justice to appreciate it. Now what he's done there is connected the digits together as you go through the digits of pi. So he started at three and he has connected three to one and then connected one to four and so on. He has also given each digit a color as well to a psychopath. He's made a package by putting numbers in a circle zero one two three four five up to nine and one have made a path and makes this beautiful piece of art. About data visualizations, which is hugely important, it goes way back! Florence Nightingale once had to represent the statistics that she had in Crimean War, where she was a nurse and the deaths that she was suffering on the wards. It was because they weren’t clear enough and she had to represent it to the state. She was a mathematician herself and she used diagrams for representing the data in a visual way. A simpler example is a pi graph representing data in a visual way. What these guys know and has become quite a thing recently is to make it beautiful as well. This is important because to communicate especially to the general public, one should be able to look at the information, understand it and enjoy looking at it and then only one appreciates it better. While talking about serious mathematics subjects like combinatorics, which is very visual as well and one can and do the maths through pictures, diagrams, networks, graphs and things like that. In the present example, we saw how pi is pretty random. Martine actually compared pi with a few randomly generated numbers. She generated all sorts of ways to randomly generated numbers and did the same sort of artistry and one can see the similar sorts of patterns coming from pi has the appearance of any of the randomly generated number. Another piece of art by Martine is the same idea again i.e. circular paths, but here there is little dots on the outside just to show that where the lines are coming from and where they going to. If it's 3.141, then above the three, is shown in with a little dot that it's going to the number one; and above the number one shows that it is coming from the number three. It's basically showing where it is going to and where it is coming from. So the size of the dots means that it occurs more often. There is a big purple-topped in the piece. Purple means nine and what it is showing is that there's a sequence in pie where there is just 9999, called the Feynman point, which is eighty six consecutive nine's, which is 762nd digit in pi. One can see it right there in the piece which are just six consecutive nines and it makes a big blob because it's coming from 9 repeatedly. Martine has done this with other numbers as well. He has done it for the golden ratio, another famous mathematical number, also e, another famous mathematical number and what he was interested in was to find out where they coincide. When he did this, he lined up these three special mathematical numbers and looked at where they had the same digit. Now, because these numbers are kind of random, he wanted to find out when they have the same digit. So, for all three numbers to have the same digit that happens with the probability of one in a hundred, when one line them up he got something, which he called the accidental similarity number and he discovered that yes they do lined up with the same digit about one in a hundred which is what probability tells us. So the average gap between linings up is about 100. He started to experiment with his accidental similarity number and made some piece of art based on that as well especially circular ones which look pretty.